AMSTAR 2 Overall Confidence Rating: Lacking Discriminating Capacity or Requirement of High Methodological Quality?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.006
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Epidemiology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Table 3: Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analyses of Predictive Factors Associated With Superior Methodological Quality (AMSTAR).

English

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Using Mod-Amstar

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2018English

Overall Web Rating Into Single Standard Five-Scale Rating

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
2019English

Systematic Review Adherence to Methodological or Reporting Quality

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Confidence Sets for Continuous-Time Rating Transition Probabilities

Journal of Banking and Finance
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2004English

Evaluation of the Reliability, Usability, and Applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: Protocol for a Descriptive Analytic Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

Power Quality Impact of High Capacity End-Users

2011English

Quality Evaluation of Systematic Reviews (PRISMA, AMSTAR-2) of Platelet Rich Plasma as a Method of Tissue Regeneration in Odontology.

Journal of Oral Research
Dentistry
2020English

Temporal Order Psychometric Functions Based on Confidence-Rating Data

Perception & Psychophysics
1975English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy