Evaluation of the Reliability, Usability, and Applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: Protocol for a Descriptive Analytic Study

Systematic Reviews - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13643-018-0746-1
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Quality Evaluation of Systematic Reviews (PRISMA, AMSTAR-2) of Platelet Rich Plasma as a Method of Tissue Regeneration in Odontology.

Journal of Oral Research
Dentistry
2020English

Limitations of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Suggestions for Improvement

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2016English

AMSTAR 2 Overall Confidence Rating: Lacking Discriminating Capacity or Requirement of High Methodological Quality?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2020English

Critical Appraisal of AMSTAR: Challenges, Limitations, and Potential Solutions From the Perspective of an Assessor

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2015English

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Using Mod-Amstar

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2018English

Table 3: Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analyses of Predictive Factors Associated With Superior Methodological Quality (AMSTAR).

English

Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy: A Protocol for a Descriptive Study

BMJ Open
Medicine
2019English

Usability Evaluation of Software Testing Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

2016English

Proof of Concept for a Human Reliability Analysis Method for Heuristic Usability Evaluation of Software

2005English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy