Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0011926
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts Published in Leading Laser Medicine Journals: An Assessment Using the CONSORT for Abstracts Guidelines

Lasers in Medical Science
DermatologySurgery
2016English

Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Trials Published in Top Five Pain Journals: A Protocol for a Systematic Survey

BMJ Open
Medicine
2016English

Relation Between the Global Burden of Disease and Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Latin America Published in the Five Leading Medical Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2008English

Risk of Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Orthopaedic Journals

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2013English

Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials

Archives of Internal Medicine
2009English

Completeness of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Subscription and Open Access Journals: Cross-Sectional Study

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2019English

Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
1998English

Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials

Ear, Nose and Throat Journal
MedicineOtorhinolaryngology
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy