The Effects of Defendant and Juror Language Use on Sentencing Recommendations

doi 10.1037/e571212013-081
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Related search

Defendant-Juror Similarity and Mock Juror Judgments.

Law and Human Behavior
ArtsPsychologyHumanitiesMental HealthPsychiatryLaw
1995English

Terror in the Justice System: Effects of Defendant Race and Religion on Juror Decision-Making in a Criminal Trial

English

Aboriginal Canadians in the Courtroom: Effects of Defendant and Eyewitness Race on Juror Decision-Making in a Criminal Trial

English

SEOR Recommendations on the Use of Protons

Clinical and Translational Oncology
MedicineCancer ResearchOncology
2019English

Clinical Recommendations on the Use of Teriflunomide

Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova
PsychiatryMental HealthNeurology
2016English

Overview of Language Rights in the International Criminal Law Sentencing Models

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
LinguisticsLawLanguage
2018English

Juror Stigma Towards Mental Illness and the Effects of Challenge for Cause Procedures

English

Limiting the Use of Acquitted and Uncharged Conduct at Sentencing: Apprendi v. New Jersey and Its Effect on the Relevant Conduct Provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

California Law Review
Law
2001English

Healing Through Language: Positive Physical Health Effects of Indigenous Language Use

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy