Erratum To: Assessment of a Method to Detect Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews

Systematic Reviews- United Kingdom

doi 10.1186/2046-4053-3-22

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Categories

Date

March 26, 2014

Authors

Paul G Shekelle

Breanne Johnsen

Sydne J Newberry

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Two Methods Provide Similar Signals for the Need to Update Systematic Reviews

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

English

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health

Occupational Health

English

Genetic Stochastic Resonance: A New Fault Diagnosis Method to Detect Weak Signals in Mechanical Systems

Advanced Science Letters

Environmental Science

Computer Science

English

Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Health Informatics

English

Applying Information Retrieval Techniques to Detect Duplicates and to Rank References in the Preliminary Phases of Systematic Literature Reviews

CLEI Electronic Journal

English

Preparing and Updating Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials of Health Care

Milbank Quarterly

Occupational Health

English

A Method to Detect AAC Audio Forgery

English

New Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Farewell to Interviews

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

English

Hiding in Plain Sight – Using Signals to Detect Terrorists

Political Science

English