Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1471-2288-6-27
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Identifying Approaches for Assessing Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Descriptive Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Poor Methodological Quality but Higher Reporting Standards Seen in Systematic Reviews in Radiation Dermatitis

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
OncologyRadiologyCancer ResearchRadiationNuclear MedicineImaging
2019English

Systematic Review Adherence to Methodological or Reporting Quality

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Methods of Conduct and Reporting of Living Systematic Reviews: A Protocol for a Living Methodological Survey

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2019English

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2007English

Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials

BJS open
Surgery
2020English

Effectiveness of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews

Frontiers of Nursing
EducationNursing
2019English

The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Spain: A Methodological Systematic Review

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy