Surveying the Literature From Animal Experiments: Avoidance of Bias Is Objective of Systematic Reviews, Not Meta-Analysis

BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.331.7508.110-c
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Surveying the Literature From Animal Experiments: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Are Important Contributions

BMJ
2005English

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Preclinical Studies: Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Experiments

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2011English

Assessment of the Abstract Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Dose-Response Meta-Analysis: A Literature Survey

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2019English

The Interpretation of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses: An Objective or Subjective Process?

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Health PolicyHealth Informatics
2008English

Figure 2: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) Flowchart of the Systematic Search of Literature.

English

Meta-Analysis of Systematic Literature Review Methods

International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science
2019English

Animal Experiments Scrutinised: Systematic Reviews Demonstrate Poor Human Clinical and Toxicological Utility

Altex
MedicineMedical Laboratory TechnologyPharmacology
2007English

An Overview of Conducting Systematic Reviews With Network Meta-Analysis

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2014English

From the Editors’ Desk: Bias in Systematic Reviews—Let the Reader Beware

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy