Animal Experiments Scrutinised: Systematic Reviews Demonstrate Poor Human Clinical and Toxicological Utility

Altex - Germany
doi 10.14573/altex.2007.4.320
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

ALTEX Edition

Related search

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Preclinical Studies: Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Experiments

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2011English

Surveying the Literature From Animal Experiments: Avoidance of Bias Is Objective of Systematic Reviews, Not Meta-Analysis

BMJ
2005English

Systemic Inflammation and Microglial Activation: Systematic Review of Animal Experiments

Journal of Neuroinflammation
Molecular NeuroscienceNeurologyImmunologyCellularNeuroscience
2015English

Duration of Untreated Cardiac Arrest and Clinical Relevance of Animal Experiments

Shock
Critical CareEmergency MedicineIntensive Care Medicine
2018English

Systematic Reviews

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Medicine
1996English

The Use of Systematic Reviews for Decision Making in Animal Production Medicine and Policy

English

Complementary Therapies for Clinical Depression: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

BMJ Open
Medicine
2019English

Poor Methodological Quality but Higher Reporting Standards Seen in Systematic Reviews in Radiation Dermatitis

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
OncologyRadiologyCancer ResearchRadiationNuclear MedicineImaging
2019English

Human Capital Investment by the Poor: Informing Policy With Laboratory Experiments

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
EconomicsEconometricsHuman Resource ManagementOrganizational Behavior
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy