Individual Versus Group Decision Making: Jurors’ Reliance on Central and Peripheral Information to Evaluate Expert Testimony

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0183580
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

Nothing but the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
LawEducation
2008English

Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Courtroom Preparation of Hypnotic and Nonhypnotic Eyewitnesses; Jurors' Perceptions of Witness Testimony and the Impact of Expert Testimony.

English

The Relationship Between Beliefs, Strength of Evidence, Statistical Presentation, and Expert Testimony on Jury Decision-Making in DNA Cases

English

Multiattribute Group Decision Making With Unknown Decision Expert Weights Information in the Framework of Interval Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers

Mathematical Problems in Engineering
MathematicsEngineering
2014English

Expert Testimony:

English

The Influence Polygraph and Rape Expert Testimony Has on the Verdicts of Jurors in a Simulated Sexual Assault Trail.

English

Medical Expert Testimony

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicine
1882English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy