Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Nothing but the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00140.x
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
LawEducation
Date

December 1, 2008

Authors
Cheryl BoudreauMathew D. McCubbins
Publisher

Wiley


Related search

The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2018English

Convergence to the Truth and Nothing but the Truth

Philosophy of Science
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1989English

P223 Consent for Medical Thoracoscopy: The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth?

Thorax
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2014English

Individual Versus Group Decision Making: Jurors’ Reliance on Central and Peripheral Information to Evaluate Expert Testimony

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

The New York Expert Testimony Project: Some Reflections on Legal Experiments

Stanford Law Review
MedicineLaw
1956English

The Relationship Between Beliefs, Strength of Evidence, Statistical Presentation, and Expert Testimony on Jury Decision-Making in DNA Cases

English

Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Expert Testimony:

English

Medical Expert Testimony

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicine
1882English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy