Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Sample Coverage Affects the Fraction of Detectable (Frequency >1) Chromosomal K-Mers in Simulated Samples.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4588/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Fraction of Unique K-Mers in Bacteria and Unique Chromosomal K-Mers Shared With the Plasmid Database.
Figure 3: Variant Features Including Allele Fraction, Coverage, Genomic Location and COSMIC/dbSNP Content in TCGA Samples.
Figure 4: Sample Pooling Affects Estimates of Sample Variance in RT-qPCR.
Figure 3: Schematic Diagram of Sample Statistics.
Figure 3: Average % Coverage of the Top and Second Hit During Stage 1 of the PneumoCaT for Serotypes Determined by Mapping Coverage Only.
Figure 5: Differential Coverage of the Viral Contigs Assembled Using a Combination of the DNA-spiked Sample and the 1 × MDA Sample With Each Individual Read Sets.
Figure 1: Bacterial Composition of Sewage Samples.
Figure 1: Map of Sample Collection Sites.
Table 1: Characteristics of the Study Sample (Women With Paired Samples).
