Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: Differential Coverage of the Viral Contigs Assembled Using a Combination of the DNA-spiked Sample and the 1 × MDA Sample With Each Individual Read Sets.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4351/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Comparison of the Viral Reads From the Individual Datasets Mapping to the Six Assembled Virus Genomes (Green, DNA-spiked Sample; Blue, 1 × MDA; Red, 2 × MDA).
Table 3: The 20 Most Up/Downregulated Contigs in Each Sample Cross-Comparison.
Table 1: Statistics for Megahit Contigs, Recruitment to Data-Rich-Contigs, and Relative Abundance of Draft Genome Results for Each Sample.
Figure 4: CLL003: Plot of the Estimates of the Proportions of the Haplotypes in Each Sample.
Table 1: Main Features of the Sample (Total Sample).
Figure 3: Coverage of crAssphage by Contigs Predicted by virMine as Viral or Unknown.
Figure 3: Sample Coverage Affects the Fraction of Detectable (Frequency >1) Chromosomal K-Mers in Simulated Samples.
Supplemental Information 11: Expanded Read-Mapping Statistics for Columbicola and Pediculus Mitochondrial Contigs Assembled With MITObim Using aTRAM-assembled Starting References
Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Summary of the Sequencing Depth for Each Sample.
