The Ability of Different Peer Review Procedures to Flag Problematic Publications

Scientometrics - Netherlands
doi 10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Peer Review for Biomedical Publications: We Can Improve the System

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2014English

Scientific Publications and Peer-Review Systems in Bio-Medical Journals

Health Renaissance
1970English

Contribution of Italian Spine Research to Peer Reviewed Publications

European Spine Journal
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2011English

Peer Review of Peer Review?

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1990English

Screening Procedures to Identify Problematic Substance Use in Medical Emergency Department Patients

Addiction science & clinical practice
PsychiatryClinical PsychologyMental Health
2012English

The Peer Review Process II: To Review and Be Reviewed

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2011English

Peer Review Matters: Creating Effective Peer Review

Language Arts Journal of Michigan
2005English

Solutions for Enabling Communication Between Different Proprietary Peer-To-Peer Systems

2011English

The Responsibilities of Peer Review

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
GynecologyObstetrics
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy