(PDF) Table 4: Pairwise FST Values Between Studied

Table 4: Pairwise FST Values Between Studied Populations of the Noble Crayfish (Below Diagonal), and Significance Values of Allelic Differentiation for Each Population Pair (Above Diagonal) After Sequential Bonferroni Adjustments.

doi 10.7717/peerj.7301/table-4

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table 4: Pairwise FST Values (Below Diagonal) and Geographic Distance (Km) (Above Diagonal) Among Garra Cambodgiensis Population Samples in the Upper Nan River, Thailand.

English

Table 6: Pairwise FST Divergences Between the Analysed Brown Trout Populations Based on Microsatellite (Below Diagonal) and Nuclear PCR-RFLP Data (Above Diagonal) and Their Significance Level.

English

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Pairwise Nm Values (Below the Diagonal) and Geographic Distances (Above the Diagonal) Among the 21 Sampled Populations of B. Schreberi.

English

Figure 2: Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of the FST Values Between Studied Populations of the Noble Crayfish.

English

Supplemental Information 2: Pairwise FST Values Between Pairs of Studied Populations.

English

Table S2: Pairwise FST Values

English

Table 1: Number of Unique (Diagonal in Bold) and Shared (Below the Diagonal) Lepidopteran Species Between Restoration Treatments.

English

Table 5: Pairwise FST Values for Porites Lobata Sampled From Oahu and Maui.

English

Table 1: Phenotypic Correlations (Spearman’s Rank) Among Morphological Traits in Orchis Mascula (Above Diagonal) and O. Pauciflora (Below Diagonal).

English

Amanote Research

Table 4: Pairwise FST Values Between Studied Populations of the Noble Crayfish (Below Diagonal), and Significance Values of Allelic Differentiation for Each Population Pair (Above Diagonal) After Sequential Bonferroni Adjustments.

doi 10.7717/peerj.7301/table-4

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Table 4: Pairwise FST Values (Below Diagonal) and Geographic Distance (Km) (Above Diagonal) Among Garra Cambodgiensis Population Samples in the Upper Nan River, Thailand.

Table 6: Pairwise FST Divergences Between the Analysed Brown Trout Populations Based on Microsatellite (Below Diagonal) and Nuclear PCR-RFLP Data (Above Diagonal) and Their Significance Level.

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Pairwise Nm Values (Below the Diagonal) and Geographic Distances (Above the Diagonal) Among the 21 Sampled Populations of B. Schreberi.

Figure 2: Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of the FST Values Between Studied Populations of the Noble Crayfish.

Supplemental Information 2: Pairwise FST Values Between Pairs of Studied Populations.

Table S2: Pairwise FST Values

Table 1: Number of Unique (Diagonal in Bold) and Shared (Below the Diagonal) Lepidopteran Species Between Restoration Treatments.

Table 5: Pairwise FST Values for Porites Lobata Sampled From Oahu and Maui.

Table 1: Phenotypic Correlations (Spearman’s Rank) Among Morphological Traits in Orchis Mascula (Above Diagonal) and O. Pauciflora (Below Diagonal).