The Impact of Aberrant Responses and Detection in Forced-Choice Noncognitive Assessment

ETS Research Report Series - United States
doi 10.1002/ets2.12222
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Chance Guessing in a Forced-Choice Recognition Task and the Detection of Malingering.

Neuropsychology
Physiological PsychologyNeuropsychology
2008English

Testing Signal-Detection Models of Yes/No and Two-Alternative Forced-Choice Recognition Memory.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
MedicineDevelopmental NeurosciencePsychologyExperimentalCognitive Psychology
2009English

Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures

Organizational Research Methods
Decision SciencesStrategyManagementManagement of TechnologyInnovation
2019English

Performance Differences Among the Intervals in Forced-Choice Tasks

Perception & Psychophysics
1984English

Combined Forced Oscillation and Forced Expiration Measurements in Mice for the Assessment of Airway Hyperresponsiveness

Respiratory Research
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2010English

Yes/No Recognition, Forced-Choice Recognition, and the Human Hippocampus

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
2008English

The Impact of Forced Migration on Mortality

Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2017English

Bias and Sensitivity in Two-Interval Forced Choice Procedures: Tests of the Difference Model

Vision Research
OphthalmologySensory Systems
2008English

Electromechanical Coupled Forced Responses for Microplate

Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy