Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Appendectomy

BMC Surgery - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1471-2482-1-4
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
MedicineSurgery
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Double-Incision, Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
Medicine
2018English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Elderly Patients

Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
2011English

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis

Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
2009English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: Retrospective Comparison in Rural Urban Settings

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
2014English

Short- And Long-Term Results of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy

World Journal of Surgery
Surgery
2011English

Retained Appendicolith After Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Surgical Endoscopy
Surgery
2004English

Midgut Volvulus After Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil)
Medicine
2012English

Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Appendectomy - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BMC Gastroenterology
MedicineGastroenterology
2010English

Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Annals of Coloproctology
Gastroenterology
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy