Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Double-Incision, Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Asian journal of endoscopic surgery - Japan
doi 10.1111/ases.12467
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Appendectomy - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BMC Gastroenterology
MedicineGastroenterology
2010English

Conventional Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Technical Details

Cocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi
Child HealthSurgeryPediatricsPerinatology
2016English

Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Appendectomy

BMC Surgery
MedicineSurgery
2001English

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Surgical Trainees

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Surgery
2016English

Risk Factors for Additional Port Insertion in Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne
GynecologySurgeryUrologyObstetricsGastroenterology
2019English

Retained Appendicolith After Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Surgical Endoscopy
Surgery
2004English

Can Two-Port Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Appendectomy Be a Good Alternative to Open and Three Port Appendectomies?

Haseki Tip Bulteni
Medicine
2016English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Elderly Patients

Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
2011English

Midgut Volvulus After Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil)
Medicine
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy