Puk20 - Cost-Utility Analysis of Extracorporeal Lithotripsy Versus Ureterorenoscopy-Holmium Laser for Treatment of Urinary Stones <20 Mm.

Value in Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2818
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the Management of Ureteral Stones: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Medical & Surgical Urology
2016English

Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL): Efficacy in Treatment of Urinary System Stones

Acta Informatica Medica
Medicine
2014English

Treatment of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy

European Urology
Urology
2001English

Effectiveness of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Multiple Unilateral Intrarenal Stones Smaller Than 2 Cm

Advances in Urology
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2014English

Holmium : YAG Laser for Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy

Medical Journal Armed Forces India
Medicine
2007English

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Renal and Ureteral Stones

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira
Medicine
2015English

Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: Prevalence of Renal Stones 3-21 Months After Treatment

American Journal of Roentgenology
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
1988English

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Children: Results of Treatment in Cases of Large Renal Stones

Urology Herald
2019English

Mp54-07 Comparision of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Small Moderated-Sized Renal Stones: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Journal of Urology
Urology
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy