Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 1: Map of Trinidad and Tobago Showing the UTT Sample Sites for Non-CVD Participants and Hospitals for CVD Participants.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8232/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 1: Distribution of the Major Characteristics Measured Among the Non-Cvd* and CVD Participants for the Sample (N = 778).
Figure 3: Stacked Histograms for the Risk Scores From the ASSIGN (A), Framingham (B), and QRISK®2 (C) Models for Non-CVD and CVD Participants in the TT2015 Sample.
Figure 2: Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) Plot for Three Established CVD Risk Prediction Models in the Trinidad and Tobago Population.
Table 3: Mean Scores for Each Risk Model for Non-Cvd* and CVD Groups in the Sample.
Supplemental Information 3: Percentage Distribution of Persons Categorised by Three Established Risk Models Into Different Risk Levels for Non-CVD and CVD Groups From the TT2015 Study on a Trinidad and Tobago Sample (N = 778).
Figure 1: Map of Sample Collection Sites.
Figure 1: Demographics of Study Participants.
Non-Selective Tungsten CVD Technology for Gate Electrodes and Interconnections
Figure 1: Flow-Chart of Study Participants.
