Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Genetic Structure Analyses of 25 Training Populations at K = 2–5 (A) and Cross-Validation Error of Each K Value (B) Based on 48 SNPs.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6508/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 6: Bayesian Clustering as Determined by STRUCTURE Analysis of Nuclear Microsatellite Data at K = 2 − 5. (A) Structure With K = 2; (B) Structure With K = 3; (C) Structure With K = 4; (D) Structure With K = 5.
Figure 1: K-Fold (K = 5) Cross Validation Method.
Figure 5: Ancestral Origin Analyses of Six Testing Populations Based on 48 SNPs. (A) Genetic Components of Six Testing Populations by ADMIXTURE Software V1.3. (B) Principal Component Analysis of Six Testing Populations and Three Continental Populations.
Figure 4: Bayesian Individual Assignment Implemented Using STRUCTURE for K = 2 Clusters (A), K = 3 Clusters (B) and K = 5 Clusters (C) Without Using Geographical Area as a Prior.
Figure S4: Inferring Optimal Number of Genetic Clusters From STRUCTURE Analysis Based on Distribution of Pr(K) at K Ranging From 1 to 6
Figure S1: The ΔK Test in Structure Indicated the Maximum Value of ΔK at K = 3 With a Secondary Peak at K = 6
Figure 2: Population Specific in Values of 48 SNPs in African, American, European and East Asian Populations.
Table S5: Genetic Data of 48 SNPs in Populations Used in This Study
Figure 4: Histological Cross-Sections of Ulnae, Under OL (A–C) and CPL (D–K).
