Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 6: Bayesian Clustering as Determined by STRUCTURE Analysis of Nuclear Microsatellite Data at K = 2 − 5. (A) Structure With K = 2; (B) Structure With K = 3; (C) Structure With K = 4; (D) Structure With K = 5.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8598/fig-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Bayesian Individual Assignment Implemented Using STRUCTURE for K = 2 Clusters (A), K = 3 Clusters (B) and K = 5 Clusters (C) Without Using Geographical Area as a Prior.
Figure 6: The Structure of Both Sympatric Populations Inferred by Bayesian Clustering Is Showed Using STRUCTURE Software (K = 2) With DESTRUCT Output.
Figure S1: Structure Plots for K = 1 to K = 6
Figure S1: The ΔK Test in Structure Indicated the Maximum Value of ΔK at K = 3 With a Secondary Peak at K = 6
Figure 4: Genetic Structure Analyses of 25 Training Populations at K = 2–5 (A) and Cross-Validation Error of Each K Value (B) Based on 48 SNPs.
Figure 2: Bayesian Genetic Structure Results Obtained With STRUCTURE.
Model for Thec(2×2) Structure Induced by K on Au(110)
Physical Review B
Structure and Pseudosymmetry of Cholesterol at 310 K
Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
Efficient Multi-Structure Robust Fitting With Incremental Top-K Lists Comparison
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer Science
Theoretical Computer Science
