Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: A MAUVE (Darling Et Al., 2004) Alignment of Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana Chloroplast Genomes Showing the Lack of Rearrangements Between the Chloroplast Genomes of the Two Species.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7026/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Fagus Crenata (Subgenus Fagus) and Comparison With F. Engleriana (Subgenus Engleriana)
Figure 6: The Number of Chloroplast Microsatellites of Each Repeat Type Shared in Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.
Figure 5: Comparative Analysis of the Nucleotide Diversity (Pi) Values Between the 101 Regions (39 Coding Genes, 52 Intergenic Spacers, and 10 Intron Regions) of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of the Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.
Figure 1: Chloroplast Genome Map of Fagus Crenata.
Supplemental Information 4: Information on All 46 Observed Chloroplast Microsatellites That Displayed Variation Between Fagus Crenata and Fagus Engleriana.
Figure 2: The Best Scoring Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on 143,882 Bp of Non-Gapped Sequence in a Gblock Alignment of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of Fagus Crenata, F. Engleriana, Representative Genera of the Fagaceae and Outgroups From Betulaceae, Juglandaceae and Myricaceae.
Comparative Chloroplast Genomes of Camellia Species
PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
Figure 2: Gene Arrangement Map of Chloroplast Genome Alignment of Seven Representative Species From Seven Campanulid Families and Coffea Arabica (As a Reference) Determined by Mauve Software (Darling Et Al., 2004).
Figure 4: Percent Identity Plot for the Comparison of Eight Composite Chloroplast Genomes.
