Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 6: The Number of Chloroplast Microsatellites of Each Repeat Type Shared in Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7026/fig-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Fagus Crenata (Subgenus Fagus) and Comparison With F. Engleriana (Subgenus Engleriana)
Supplemental Information 4: Information on All 46 Observed Chloroplast Microsatellites That Displayed Variation Between Fagus Crenata and Fagus Engleriana.
Figure 1: Chloroplast Genome Map of Fagus Crenata.
Figure 4: A MAUVE (Darling Et Al., 2004) Alignment of Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana Chloroplast Genomes Showing the Lack of Rearrangements Between the Chloroplast Genomes of the Two Species.
Figure 7: The Average Length (Bp) of Variable Versus Non-Variable Chloroplast Microsatellites for Both Mono- And Di-Nucleotide Repeat Motif Types Observed in Both (A) Fagus Crenata and (B) F. Engleriana Including the Standard Deviation (Error Bars) and Minimum and Maximum Lengths (Empty Circles).
Supplemental Information 1: The Whole Chloroplast Genome of Fagus Crenata (Genbank Accession Number MH171101).
Figure 5: Comparative Analysis of the Nucleotide Diversity (Pi) Values Between the 101 Regions (39 Coding Genes, 52 Intergenic Spacers, and 10 Intron Regions) of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of the Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.
Figure 2: The Best Scoring Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on 143,882 Bp of Non-Gapped Sequence in a Gblock Alignment of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of Fagus Crenata, F. Engleriana, Representative Genera of the Fagaceae and Outgroups From Betulaceae, Juglandaceae and Myricaceae.
Figure 3: Boxplot Illustrating the Average Number of Green Crabs Captured in Each Trap Type.
