Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM

PeerJ - United States
doi 10.7717/peerj.8247
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 1: Examples of Unprofessional Peer Reviews From Survey Respondents.

English

Reflections on Experiences of a Successful STEM Scholarship Program for Underrepresented Groups

English

Publishing a Peer-Reviewed Journal Without Peer Reviews

Journal of Food Science
Food Science
2017English

Unprofessional Behaviour

BMJ
1992English

Members of Underrepresented Groups: Reviewers for Journal Manuscripts Wanted

Memory and Cognition
ArtsNeuropsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesPhysiological PsychologyMedicineExperimental
1991English

Scientific Storytelling and Publishing Peer Reviews

Cell Systems
Forensic MedicinePathologyCell BiologyHistology
2018English

Identifying Localization in Peer Reviews of Argument Diagrams

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2013English

Peer-To-Peer Health-Related Online Support Groups

English

Reviewing Reviews: An Evaluation of Peer Reviews of Journal Article Submissions

Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin
OceanographyWater ScienceTechnologyAquatic Science
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy