Comparing the Coverage, Recall, and Precision of Searches for 120 Systematic Reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A Prospective Study

Systematic Reviews - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Is the Coverage of Google Scholar Enough to Be Used Alone for Systematic Reviews

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Health PolicyHealth Informatics
2013English

Variation in Number of Hits for Complex Searches in Google Scholar

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
MedicineInformation SciencesLibraryHealth Informatics
2016English

Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences

Scientometrics
Computer Science ApplicationsSocial SciencesLibraryInformation Sciences
2009English

The Development of Search Filters for Adverse Effects of Surgical Interventions in Medline and Embase

Health Information and Libraries Journal
Health Information ManagementInformation SciencesLibraryHealth Informatics
2018English

Dialysis Search Filters for PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase Databases

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
EpidemiologyNephrologyCritical CareTransplantationIntensive Care Medicine
2012English

Google Scholar: A Source for Clinicians?

CMAJ
Medicine
2005English

Over 85% of Included Studies in Systematic Reviews Are on MEDLINE

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2016English

Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and Google Scholar: Comparing Search Performance Using User Queries

2016English

Comparing the Results of Recall Surveys and Standardized Searches in Understanding Bird-Window Collisions at Houses

Avian Conservation and Ecology
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsAnimal ScienceLandscape ConservationBehaviorZoology
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy