Over 85% of Included Studies in Systematic Reviews Are on MEDLINE

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.002
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Epidemiology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Outcome Choice and Definition in Systematic Reviews Leads to Few Eligible Studies Included in Meta-Analyses: A Case Study

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2020English

Implementing Systematic Reviews of Prognosis Studies in Cochrane

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2018English

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

How to Avoid Bias in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies

Revista CEFAC
2017English

Comparing the Coverage, Recall, and Precision of Searches for 120 Systematic Reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A Prospective Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2016English

Systematic Reviews

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Medicine
1996English

No Role for Quality Scores in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2005English

A Suggestion for Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology

Epidemiology and health
Medicine
2016English

Systematic Reviews in the Bulletin

Bulletin of the World Health Organization
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy