Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 6: Differences of Each Residue Contribution Between the WT System and the Mutant Systems.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6299/fig-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Contribution of Each TRP Residue Toward the Intrinsic Fluorescence of the Giα1protein
Protein Science
Biochemistry
Medicine
Molecular Biology
Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Supplemental Information 1: Contribution Energy for Each Residue in the Template (A) and Modeled Complex Between Geldanamycin and Swine HSP90AB1 (B).
Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Supplemental Information 6: The Correlation Analysis Between Each Sample.
Figure 9: Alignment of the Last Snapshot Between Mps1WT/CPD-5 and the Mutant Systems From GaMD Simulations.
Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 5: Alignment of the Last Snapshot Between Mps1WT/CPD-5 and the Mutant Systems From Conventional MD Simulations.
Table 1: Binding Free Energies of CPD-5 in WT and Mutant Systems (Kcal/Mol).
