Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-5

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

English

Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

English

Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.

English

Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.

English

Incomplete Fractal Showers and Restoration of Dimension

EPJ Web of Conferences
AstronomyPhysics
2019English

Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.

English

Soil Fertility Quality Assessment Under Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns

Acta Ecologica Sinica
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2014English

Figure 2: STRUCTURE Analysis of Three Fagaceae Species in Restoration Areas and Nearest Natural Forest.

English

Forest and Landscape Restoration at Pontal Do Paranapanema: Ecological Attributes of Forest Restoration in a Coffee Agroforestry System

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy