Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.
Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.
Incomplete Fractal Showers and Restoration of Dimension
EPJ Web of Conferences
Astronomy
Physics
Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
Soil Fertility Quality Assessment Under Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Behavior
Figure 2: STRUCTURE Analysis of Three Fagaceae Species in Restoration Areas and Nearest Natural Forest.
Forest and Landscape Restoration at Pontal Do Paranapanema: Ecological Attributes of Forest Restoration in a Coffee Agroforestry System
