Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: Model-Averaged Coefficients (Full Average) for Fledgling Cerulean Warbler Versus Random Fledgling Point Models.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7358/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: Models, Along With AICc Values, Degrees of Freedom, and Weights for Presence of Fledgling Cerulean Warbler Locations Compared to Random Vegetation Points.
Table 1: Distances and the Number of Days Fledgling Cerulean Warblers Were Tracked in 2015, 2016, & 2017.
Table 3: Model Coefficients of Final Models.
Figure S1: Map of Seven Different Fledgling Cerulean Warblers (1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10) From Different Nests
Table 3: Statistics of the Linear Regressions Between the Anchorage Depth for Nests (Cm) and the Percentage of Hatching, Fledgling and Breeding Success, and Between the Average Fluctuation Rate (Cm/Day) and the Percentage of Hatching, Fledgling and Breeding Success.
Partners in Crime: Fledgling Tumors Hijack Inflammation
Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research
Medicine
Virology
Immunology
Cell Biology
Figure 3: Hatching, Fledgling and Breeding Success Mean in Pego-Oliva N.P. (2002–2009).
Table 3: Correlation Coefficients.
Table 3: Alpha Coefficients.
