Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 2: Models, Along With AICc Values, Degrees of Freedom, and Weights for Presence of Fledgling Cerulean Warbler Locations Compared to Random Vegetation Points.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7358/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 3: Model-Averaged Coefficients (Full Average) for Fledgling Cerulean Warbler Versus Random Fledgling Point Models.
Simulation Mechanism With 2 Degrees of Freedom
International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science
Table 1: The Best Five Models Based on AICc Relating the Presence of Each Taxon.
Table 1: Distances and the Number of Days Fledgling Cerulean Warblers Were Tracked in 2015, 2016, & 2017.
Figure 2: Cerulean Warbler Fledglings Were Positively Associated With Greater Vegetation Density at Morgan–Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Indiana, 2015–2017.
Scale-Free Property for Degrees and Weights in an N-Interactions Random Graph Model*
Journal of Mathematical Sciences
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Statistics
Probability
Degrees of Freedom
Science
Multidisciplinary
Philosophy of Science
History
Figure 5: Violin Plots of the AICc Weights for Each Model.
Avian Response to Timber Harvesting Applied Experimentally to Manage Cerulean Warbler Breeding Populations
Forest Ecology and Management
Management
Monitoring
Nature
Forestry
Landscape Conservation
Policy
Law