Figure 3: Bubble Plot (Meta-Regression) of the Influence of the Summary BI (Blinding Effectiveness) on Between-Group Effect Size (Pain) for Pain Assessments Closest to the Time Point Blinding Was Assessed (N = 12 Group Comparisons).

doi 10.7717/peerj.5318/fig-3
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 6: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments in the Long-Term (One to Six Months; N = 16 Group Comparisons).

English

Figure 4: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments Immediately After the First/Only Intervention (<24 H; N = 7 Group Comparisons).

English

Table 5: Hypothesised Effects of Intervention Belief on Pain for Group Comparisons Where the Blinding Index (BI) Could Be Calculated (N = 12 Group Comparisons) (Adapted From Bang Et Al. (2010)).

English

Table 2: Interpretation of the Blinding Index (BI) and Classifications.

English

Blinding the Monocytes to Protect the Heart

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
2013English

Blinding Trachoma: The Forgotten Problem

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Molecular NeuroscienceOphthalmologySensory SystemsCellular
2001English

On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models

2017English

Figure 3: PLS-DA Score Plot Comparing Control Group and Overweight Group.

English

Figure 7: Forest Plot of Diastolic Blood Pressure After the Intervention Between the Music Intervention Group and the Placebo Group.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy