Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 5: Hypothesised Effects of Intervention Belief on Pain for Group Comparisons Where the Blinding Index (BI) Could Be Calculated (N = 12 Group Comparisons) (Adapted From Bang Et Al. (2010)).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5318/table-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: Bubble Plot (Meta-Regression) of the Influence of the Summary BI (Blinding Effectiveness) on Between-Group Effect Size (Pain) for Pain Assessments Closest to the Time Point Blinding Was Assessed (N = 12 Group Comparisons).
Figure 4: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments Immediately After the First/Only Intervention (<24 H; N = 7 Group Comparisons).
Table S2: Pairwise Comparisons for Effects of Site Within Functional Group
Figure 6: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments in the Long-Term (One to Six Months; N = 16 Group Comparisons).
On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models
Table 2: Interpretation of the Blinding Index (BI) and Classifications.
A Non-Archimedean Dea Model to Assess Group Comparisons
Pesquisa Operacional
Management Science
Operations Research
Ethnic Group Comparisons of Variables Associated With Ischaemic Heart Disease.
Heart
Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiology
Effects of Collective Efficacy, Teamwork Attitudes, and Experience on Group Project Performance: Comparisons Between 2 Food Science Courses
Journal of Food Science Education
Education
Food Science
