Table 5: Hypothesised Effects of Intervention Belief on Pain for Group Comparisons Where the Blinding Index (BI) Could Be Calculated (N = 12 Group Comparisons) (Adapted From Bang Et Al. (2010)).

doi 10.7717/peerj.5318/table-5

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 3: Bubble Plot (Meta-Regression) of the Influence of the Summary BI (Blinding Effectiveness) on Between-Group Effect Size (Pain) for Pain Assessments Closest to the Time Point Blinding Was Assessed (N = 12 Group Comparisons).

English

Figure 4: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments Immediately After the First/Only Intervention (<24 H; N = 7 Group Comparisons).

English

Table S2: Pairwise Comparisons for Effects of Site Within Functional Group

English

Figure 6: Forest Plot of Pooled Between-Group Effect Sizes (Pain) Based on Blinding Adequacy, for Pain Assessments in the Long-Term (One to Six Months; N = 16 Group Comparisons).

English

On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models

2017English

Table 2: Interpretation of the Blinding Index (BI) and Classifications.

English

A Non-Archimedean Dea Model to Assess Group Comparisons

Pesquisa Operacional
Management ScienceOperations Research
2016English

Ethnic Group Comparisons of Variables Associated With Ischaemic Heart Disease.

Heart
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
1978English

Effects of Collective Efficacy, Teamwork Attitudes, and Experience on Group Project Performance: Comparisons Between 2 Food Science Courses

Journal of Food Science Education
EducationFood Science
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy