Why Authors Believe That Reviewers Stress Limiting Aspects of Manuscripts: The SLAM Effect in Peer Review1

Journal of Applied Social Psychology - United States
doi 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00125.x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Related search

Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comprehensive Guide for Peer Reviewers

Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Respiratory MedicinePulmonaryCardiovascular MedicineSurgeryCardiology
2017English

The Power of Suggestion: Should Authors Nominate Peer Reviewers?

Journal of Materials Science
Mechanics of MaterialsMaterials ScienceMechanical Engineering
2017English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2019English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2018English

Thank You to JAMA Peer Reviewers and Authors

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
2013English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2016English

Reviewers of Manuscripts, Volume 35

Aliso
2017English

Reviewers of Ashs Manuscripts, 1991

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
HorticultureGenetics
1991English

Survey on Open Peer Review: Attitudes and Experience Amongst Editors, Authors and Reviewers

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy