Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Bayesian Clustering of Seven Coptoformica Species Obtained With the Software Baps.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6013/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 2: Bayesian Genetic Structure Results Obtained With STRUCTURE.
Figure 5: Maximum Likelihood Tree of COI Barcodes of Seven Coptoformica Species and Three Additional Formica Species.
Figure 2: Graphical Summary of Bayesian Clustering Results.
Figure 3: Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) of the Microsatellite Data of Seven Coptoformica Species With 24 Principal Components Included.
Figure 16: Phylogram of Relationships Among the Idarnes Incertus Species-Group Species and Eight Outgroup Species Obtained With Bayesian Inference.
Figure 6: The Structure of Both Sympatric Populations Inferred by Bayesian Clustering Is Showed Using STRUCTURE Software (K = 2) With DESTRUCT Output.
Figure 2: Bayesian STRUCTURE Clustering Results of Microsatellite Variation Among T. Mongolica Populations.
Figure 2: A Comparison of the Clustering Performance Between Local Clustering and Global Clustering.
Figure 2: The Distribution of the DEMs in Seven Datasets.
