Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 6: The Structure of Both Sympatric Populations Inferred by Bayesian Clustering Is Showed Using STRUCTURE Software (K = 2) With DESTRUCT Output.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4256/fig-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 6: Bayesian Clustering as Determined by STRUCTURE Analysis of Nuclear Microsatellite Data at K = 2 − 5. (A) Structure With K = 2; (B) Structure With K = 3; (C) Structure With K = 4; (D) Structure With K = 5.
Figure 2: Bayesian STRUCTURE Clustering Results of Microsatellite Variation Among T. Mongolica Populations.
Figure 2: Bayesian Genetic Structure Results Obtained With STRUCTURE.
Figure 2: Bayesian Clustering of Seven Coptoformica Species Obtained With the Software Baps.
Figure S1: Structure Plots for K = 1 to K = 6
Figure 2: Graphical Summary of Bayesian Clustering Results.
Figure 4: Bayesian Individual Assignment Implemented Using STRUCTURE for K = 2 Clusters (A), K = 3 Clusters (B) and K = 5 Clusters (C) Without Using Geographical Area as a Prior.
Figure 6: InTreeGreat View of the Structure Tree.
Figure 3: Genetic Structure of P. Patens Populations.
