Close Enough for Comfort? The Spatial Structure of Interest and Information in Ballot Measure Elections

Journal of Politics - United Kingdom
doi 10.1017/s0022381612000321
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Related search

WTS-2 B: Too Close for Comfort?

EPJ Web of Conferences
AstronomyPhysics
2013English

State and Local Limitations on Ballot Measure Contributions

Michigan Law Review
Law
1981English

Close Vote and Now a Ballot on GPs' Contract.

BMJ
1989English

Analyzing the Spatial-Semantic Interaction of Points of Interest in Volunteered Geographic Information

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2011English

Sophisticated Voting on Competing Ballot Measures: Spatial Theory and Evidence

SSRN Electronic Journal
2008English

Public Employees as Politicians: Evidence From Close Elections

SSRN Electronic Journal
2016English

Too Close for Comfort: Stimulus Valence Moderates the Influence of Motivational Orientation on Distance Perception.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Social PsychologySociologyPolitical Science
2014English

Debate: Too Close for Comfort? Regulation and Governance of the UK’s Nuclear Industry and Implications for Inter-Generational Equity

Public Money and Management
ManagementBusinessPublic AdministrationSociologyPolitical ScienceAccounting
2018English

Exploiting Spatial and Temporal for Point of Interest Recommendation

Complexity
MultidisciplinaryComputer Science
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy