Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: VAS Scores for Individual Questions on the Subjective Engagement Questionnaire, Split by Task Variant.
doi 10.7717/peerj.2184/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Mean Total Scores From the Subjective Questionnaire, Split by Variant and Adjusted for Age and Sex.
Figure 5: Differences in CBAS Total Scores as a Function of Scores on the Avatar Task.
Figure 2: Box and Whisker Plots of Median Go RTs, Split by Task Variant and Site.
Figure 2: The Relationship Between the Scores on Avatar Task and the Harm Avoidance (HA) Subscale of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire.
Figure 5: Split-Half Consistency Across Participants of the H/Nresp Memorability Scores in Function of Nresp.
Figure 4: The Relationship Between Scores on the Avatar Task and the CBAS Subscales.
Figure 4: Individual Attributes and Task Output.
The Role of Subjective Task Value in Service-Learning Engagement Among Chinese College Students
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
Figure 3: The Relationship Between Scores on the Avatar Task and the CBAS Total Score.
