Religious Education – Reform, Not Abolition: A Reply to Matthew Clayton and David Stephens

Theory and Research in Education- United Kingdom

doi 10.1177/1477878519831675

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Categories

Education

Date

Authors

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related search

SCOT Answers, Other Questions: A Reply to Nick Clayton

Technology and Culture
EngineeringHistory
2002English

A Reply to F. David Martin's Kandinsky and Ashmore: A Comment

Ultimate Reality and Meaning
1980English

David Henige’s Reply*

HAHR - Hispanic American Historical Review
Cultural StudiesHistory
1978English

David, Enderby and Bainton Reply

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
PsychiatryMental HealthNeurologySurgery
1983English

Reorganization as a Substitute for Reform: The Abolition of the INS

Yale Law Journal
Law
2002English

The Consistency of Probabilistic Regresses. A Reply to Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson

Studia Logica
Philosophy of ScienceLogicHistory
2010English

Dilemmas of Religious Reform (Islâh)

Égypte/Monde arabe
1998English

Religious Education

The Biblical World
1917English

Religious Education

The Biblical World
1917English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy