Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 1: A Schematic Representation of the MIRU-profiler Workflow in Comparison With the Experimental Protocol for the Standardized Genotyping of M. Tuberculosis Using 24 MIRU-VNTR Loci.

doi 10.7717/peerj.5090/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

MIRU-profiler: A Rapid Tool for Determination of 24-Loci MIRU-VNTR Profiles From Assembled Genomes of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

PeerJ
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesMedicineAgriculturalNeuroscience
2018English

MIRU-VNTR Genotyping of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Strains Using QIAxcel Technology: A Multicentre Evaluation Study

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Figure S1: Optimal Discrepancy Range for the MIRU-profiler

English

Miru-VNTR Technique for Molecular Epidemiological Studies of Tuberculosis

Tuberkulëz i bolezni lëgkikh
PulmonaryInfectious DiseasesRespiratory Medicine
2016English

Comparison Between RFLP and MIRU-VNTR Genotyping of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Strains Isolated in Stockholm 2009 to 2011

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Table 1: Comparisons Among the MIRU-profiler, CASTB and Experimental Results.

English

Figure 1: Schematic Representation of the Experimental Conditions.

English

Figure 1: Schematic Representation of the Experimental Design.

English

Figure 2: Evaluation of the MIRU-profiler on the Genome Assemblies Based on Illumina Miseq Reads.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy