Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure S1: Optimal Discrepancy Range for the MIRU-profiler

doi 10.7717/peerj.5090/supp-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table S1: Results for the MIRU-profiler Evaluation on the Draft Genomes Based on 150 Bp Reads

English

Figure 2: Evaluation of the MIRU-profiler on the Genome Assemblies Based on Illumina Miseq Reads.

English

Figure 1: A Schematic Representation of the MIRU-profiler Workflow in Comparison With the Experimental Protocol for the Standardized Genotyping of M. Tuberculosis Using 24 MIRU-VNTR Loci.

English

MIRU-profiler: A Rapid Tool for Determination of 24-Loci MIRU-VNTR Profiles From Assembled Genomes of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

PeerJ
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesMedicineAgriculturalNeuroscience
2018English

Table 1: Comparisons Among the MIRU-profiler, CASTB and Experimental Results.

English

Table S2: Details of Complete Genomes Used for Evaluation of the MIRU-profiler

English

Figure S1: Workflow

English

Figure S1: Climatic Variables for the Study Sites

English

Figure S1: The Rarefaction Curves for All Samples

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy