Rate Control Is Preferable to Rhythm Control in the Majority of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation - United States
doi 10.1161/circulationaha.104.485565
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

Rhythm Control Strategies Were Not Better Than Rate Control Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation

Evidence-Based Medicine
Medicine
2003English

Choice and Outcomes of Rate Control Versus Rhythm Control in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the REPOSI Study

Drugs and Aging
GerontologyGeriatricsPharmacology
2018English

Assessment of Atrial Fibrosis for the Rhythm Control of Atrial Fibrillation

International Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2016English

How Well Are Rate or Rhythm Control Achieved in Raft-Af Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure?

Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2015English

Rate Versus Rhythm Control Pharmacotherapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We in 2008?

Journal of Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2008English

Effect of Rate or Rhythm Control on Quality of Life in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2004English

Ranking Rate Control and Rhythm Control Therapies for Heart Failure Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
2018English

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke: The Evolving Role of Rhythm Control

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2013English

Rate Control Is a Better Initial Treatment for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Circulation Journal
MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy