Rhythm Control Strategies Were Not Better Than Rate Control Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation

Evidence-Based Medicine - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/ebm.8.5.140
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Rate Versus Rhythm Control Pharmacotherapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We in 2008?

Journal of Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2008English

Assessment of Atrial Fibrosis for the Rhythm Control of Atrial Fibrillation

International Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2016English

IV. Rhythm-Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation (Catheter Ablation)

Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
Medicine
2019English

Rate Control Is Preferable to Rhythm Control in the Majority of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
2005English

Rhythm Control Should Be Better for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Circulation Journal
MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2011English

Effect of Rate or Rhythm Control on Quality of Life in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2004English

Rate Control Is a Better Initial Treatment for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Circulation Journal
MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2011English

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke: The Evolving Role of Rhythm Control

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2013English

Ranking Rate Control and Rhythm Control Therapies for Heart Failure Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy