Temporary Anchorage Device Stability: Monocortical Versus Bicortical Anchorage Technique

UI Proceedings on Health and Medicine
doi 10.7454/uiphm.v1i0.44
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Universitas Indonesia, Directorate of Research and Public Service

Related search

Experience With Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices

Head and Face Medicine
MedicineOtorhinolaryngologyNeurologyDentistry
2014English

Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices

2014English

Implant Versus Nance Holding Arch Anchorage During Maxillary Canine Retraction

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
2010English

Cytotoxicity of Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts in Vitro

Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Dentistry
2019English

Skeletal Stability After Mandibular Setback Surgery: Bicortical Fixation Using a 2.0-Mm Locking Plate System Versus Monocortical Fixation Using a Nonlocking Plate System

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
OtorhinolaryngologyOral SurgerySurgery
2008English

Physiologic Anchorage Speewire System

Clinical Dentistry Reviewed
2018English

Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern Managed by Differential En-Masse Retraction Against a Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device in the Treatment of Bimaxillary Protrusion

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Orthodontics
2011English

Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant Versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion

International Scholarly Research Notices
2019English

Aeromagnetic Map, Anchorage Quadrangle, Alaska

1973English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy