Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant Versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
International Scholarly Research Notices
doi 10.1155/2019/8231264
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
April 4, 2019
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Related search
Comparative Evaluation of Anchorage Reinforcement Between Orthodontic Implants and Conventional Anchorage in Orthodontic Management of Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion
Medical Journal Armed Forces India
Medicine
Skeletal Versus Conventional Intraoral Anchorage for the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects
Progress in Orthodontics
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices
Implant Versus Nance Holding Arch Anchorage During Maxillary Canine Retraction
Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
Experience With Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices
Head and Face Medicine
Medicine
Otorhinolaryngology
Neurology
Dentistry
Is It Possible to Re-Use Mini-Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage? Results of an in Vitro Study
Materials Research
Mechanics of Materials
Materials Science
Condensed Matter Physics
Mechanical Engineering
Orthodontic Treatment With Skeletal Anchorage System
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)
Temporary Anchorage Device Stability: Monocortical Versus Bicortical Anchorage Technique
UI Proceedings on Health and Medicine
Movement Evaluation of Overerupted Upper Molars With Absolute Anchorage: An In-Vitro Study
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal
Medicine
Otorhinolaryngology
Surgery
Dentistry
