Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 5: Results of Face Identification for PubFig83 Dataset.
doi 10.7717/peerj-cs.197/table-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 4: Rank-1 Accuracy (%) in Face Identification for LFW Dataset.
Table 5: AMOVA Results.
Table 5: Experiment-Wise Performance Results on DRIVE Dataset (The Best Parameters Combination Is Underlined).
Table 1: Quantitative Results on the MIT Dataset.
Table 2: Clustering Results, Gallagher Dataset (C = 32 Subjects).
Table S1: Dataset
Table 9: Results of the Symmetry Tests Performed on Each Bone for the Intraspecific Dataset.
Table 3: Clustering Results, GFW Dataset (In Average, C = 46 Subjects).
Table 7: Age and Gender Recognition Results for Preprocessed UTKFace (In the Wild) Dataset.
