Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: Clustering Results, GFW Dataset (In Average, C = 46 Subjects).
doi 10.7717/peerj-cs.197/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: Clustering Results, Gallagher Dataset (C = 32 Subjects).
Table 1: Clustering Results, LFW Subset (C = 596 Subjects).
Table 1: Quantitative Results on the MIT Dataset.
Figure 3: Clustering Accuracy of (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.
Table 2: Results of Fuzzy Clustering Analyses.
Table 3: Neophobia Results.
Table 5: Results of Face Identification for PubFig83 Dataset.
Table 3: Clustering Performance vs Different Parameters.
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics Results.
