3D Shape Reasoning for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks

Computer-Aided Design and Applications - United Kingdom
doi 10.3722/cadaps.2008.153-160
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

CAD Solutions, LLC

Related search

3D Open-Surface Shape Correspondence for Statistical Shape Modeling: Identifying Topologically Consistent Landmarks

2009English

Figure 5: Shape Similarity for Reconstructions Generated From Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.

English

Identifying Anatomical Shape Difference by Regularized Discriminative Direction

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Electronic EngineeringUltrasound TechnologyRadiologicalComputer Science ApplicationsElectricalSoftware
2009English

Identifying Group-Wise Consistent White Matter Landmarks via Novel Fiber Shape Descriptor

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2013English

Figure 3: Anatomical Landmarks Used for Sparse Reconstructions.

English

Extraction of Anatomical Landmarks and Axis for 3D Coordinate System Construction of Femur and Tibia Bone Models

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Sports MedicineRheumatologyOrthopedicsBiomedical Engineering
2015English

Is the Instrumented-Pointer Method of Calibrating Anatomical Landmarks in 3D Motion Analysis Reliable?

Journal of Biomechanics
Sports MedicineSports ScienceBiophysicsOrthopedicsBiomedical EngineeringRehabilitation
2017English

Surface Anatomical Landmarks or Ultrasound for Cricoid Pressure Application

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Inter-Point Procrustes: Identifying Regional and Large Differences in 3D Anatomical Shapes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy