Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Anatomical Landmarks Used for Sparse Reconstructions.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8397/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 5: Shape Similarity for Reconstructions Generated From Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.
Table 1: Comparison of Shape Similarity Between Reconstructions Generated From Complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentations and Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.
Figure 7: Best- And Worst-Case Reconstructions Generated From Sparse Anatomical Data in Terms of Absolute Euclidean Distance (Mm).
Figure 3: Example of Location of Landmarks.
3D Shape Reasoning for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks
Computer-Aided Design and Applications
Computational Mechanics
Computational Mathematics
Computer Graphics
Computer-Aided Design
Surface Anatomical Landmarks or Ultrasound for Cricoid Pressure Application
Anaesthesia
Anesthesiology
Pain Medicine
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reliability of Anatomical Landmarks and Reference Lines Used to Assess Pelvic Organ Prolapse
International Urogynecology Journal
Gynecology
Urology
Obstetrics
Importance of Anatomical Landmarks on Axillary Neurovascular Territories for Surgery
Table 1: Fixed Anatomical Landmarks and Descriptions.
