Target-Nontarget Similarity Decreases Search Efficiency and Increases Stimulus-Driven Control in Visual Search

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics - United States
doi 10.3758/s13414-017-1367-9
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

The Equivalence of Target and Nontarget Processing in Visual Search

Perception & Psychophysics
1971English

Search Efficiency Is Not Sufficient: The Nature of Search Modulates Stimulus-Driven Attention

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
LinguisticsSensory SystemsLanguageExperimentalCognitive Psychology
2018English

Quantitative Relations Between Visual Search Speed and Target-Distractor Similarity

Perception & Psychophysics
1988English

Distinguishing Between Target and Nontarget Fixations in a Visual Search Task Using Fixation-Related Potentials

Journal of Vision
OphthalmologySensory Systems
2013English

Target-Distractor Discriminability in Visual Search

Perception & Psychophysics
1987English

Local and Global Factors of Similarity in Visual Search

Perception & Psychophysics
1994English

App Icon Similarity and Its Impact on Visual Search Efficiency on Mobile Touch Devices

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Cognitive PsychologyExperimentalCognitive Neuroscience
2018English

Stimulus-Driven and Goal-Driven Control Over Visual Selection.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
ArtsCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesBehavioral NeuroscienceMedicineExperimental
2002English

Fortune and Reversals of Fortune in Visual Search: Reward Contingencies for Pop-Out Targets Affect Search Efficiency and Target Repetition Effects

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
LinguisticsSensory SystemsLanguageExperimentalCognitive Psychology
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy