Distinguishing Between Target and Nontarget Fixations in a Visual Search Task Using Fixation-Related Potentials

Journal of Vision - United States
doi 10.1167/13.3.17
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)

Related search

The Equivalence of Target and Nontarget Processing in Visual Search

Perception & Psychophysics
1971English

Target-Nontarget Similarity Decreases Search Efficiency and Increases Stimulus-Driven Control in Visual Search

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
LinguisticsSensory SystemsLanguageExperimentalCognitive Psychology
2017English

The Impact of Task Demands on Fixation-Related Brain Potentials During Guided Search

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Affective Visual Event-Related Potentials: Arousal, Repetition, and Time-On-Task

Biological Psychology
NeurosciencePhysiological PsychologyNeuropsychology
2007English

Quantitative Relations Between Visual Search Speed and Target-Distractor Similarity

Perception & Psychophysics
1988English

Target-Distractor Discriminability in Visual Search

Perception & Psychophysics
1987English

TAM: Explaining Off-Object Fixations and Central Fixation Tendencies as Effects of Population Averaging During Search

Visual Cognition
Cognitive PsychologyArtsCognitive NeuroscienceExperimentalHumanities
2012English

2e3-4 EFRP Related to Targets and to Peripheral Views in the Visual Search Task.

The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
2014English

Sleep and Rest Facilitate Implicit Memory in a Visual Search Task

Vision Research
OphthalmologySensory Systems
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy